| HS Code | 972703 |
| Chemical Formula | C6H6O |
| Molecular Weight | 94.11 g/mol |
| Cas Number | 108-95-2 |
| Usp Grade Specification | Meets United States Pharmacopeia (USP) requirements |
| Appearance | Colorless to slightly pink crystalline solid |
| Odor | Sweet and tarry |
| Melting Point | 40.5 °C |
| Boiling Point | 181.7 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Approximately 8.3 g/100 mL at 20 °C |
| Density | 1.07 g/cm3 at 25 °C |
| Purity Assay | 99.0% to 100.5% (anhydrous basis) |
| Storage Conditions | Store in a tightly closed container, protected from light, in a cool, dry area |
As an accredited USP Grade Phenol factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | USP Grade Phenol is packaged in 500 g amber glass bottles with secure caps, labeled for laboratory use. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL: load USP Grade Phenol in sealed drums, secure pallets, mark hazard labels, ensure ventilation and spill containment. |
| Shipping | USP Grade Phenol ships as a hazardous material (UN 1671/2312, Class 6.1, PG II). It requires corrosion-resistant, leakproof containers with toxic hazard labeling. If molten, maintain temperature control. Segregate from foodstuffs and oxidizers. Include proper shipping documentation, emergency response info, and compliance with IATA/IMDG/49 CFR regulations. |
| Storage | Store USP Grade Phenol in tightly closed, light-resistant containers in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Keep away from heat, ignition sources, and incompatible materials like strong oxidizers. Ensure secondary containment to prevent spills. Follow local regulations and label clearly. Personnel must use appropriate PPE when handling or accessing storage. |
| Shelf Life | USP Grade Phenol has a shelf life of two years when stored tightly sealed, protected from light and moisture. |
In multi-dose injectable products, USP Grade Phenol functions as a preservative at concentrations typically between 2.5 mg/mL and 5.0 mg/mL (0.25–0.5% w/v). The monograph requires an anhydrous assay of 99.0–100.5% and a congealing temperature not lower than 40°C. Phenol is combined with m-cresol in several commercial insulin and peptide hormone presentations because the two preservatives cover overlapping but not identical challenge organisms; m-cresol contributes activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while phenol broadens coverage against fungal spores. Preservative efficacy testing under USP <51> uses Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027, Candida albicans ATCC 10231, and Aspergillus brasiliensis ATCC 16404. For parenteral products, the bacterial acceptance criterion is not less than 1.0 log reduction from the initial calculated count at 7 days and not less than 3.0 log reduction at 14 days, with no increase from the 14-day count at 28 days; fungal counts show no increase from the initial calculated count at 7, 14, and 28 days. The terminal dosage forms include multi-dose insulin vials, allergen immunotherapy extracts, and sterile diluents for peptide hormones. Phenol is not suitable for intrathecal, epidural, or perineural administration unless deliberate neurolysis is intended; above 5% w/v the compound denatures axonal proteins. For licensed biologicals, preservation must also meet 21 CFR 610.15(a) for multi-dose container systems. Aqueous phenol partitions into elastomeric closures; natural rubber stoppers cause a measurable loss of free phenol within the first 3 months of storage. Chlorobutyl and bromobutyl closures are preferred because their lower unsaturation reduces preservative uptake. Phenol is added before sterile filtration at 0.22 µm where the process train allows.
Table 1. Preservative loading and compendial monitoring matrix.
| Product class | Phenol concentration | Vehicle and pH | Primary test standard | Operational boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-dose insulin/peptide solution | 0.15–0.5% w/v | Sterile aqueous, pH 6.5–7.5 | USP <51>, USP <1> | Combine with m-cresol; avoid natural rubber closures |
| Multi-dose vaccine or diluent | 0.25% w/v | Buffered saline, pH 6.0–7.0 | 21 CFR 610.15(a), USP <51> | Not for single-dose final containers |
| Topical OTC antipruritic/anesthetic | 0.5–1.5% w/v | Hydroethanolic or lotion, pH 4.0–5.5 | FDA OTC monograph, USP <795> | Do not use under occlusive dressing on large areas |
| Neurolytic injection | 5–10% w/v | Glycerin or sterile water | USP <797>, USP <85> | Single-use; no terminal steam sterilization after mixing |
Phenol-containing parenterals are tested for bacterial endotoxins according to USP <85>; the endotoxin limit for general injectables is calculated from the maximum human dose. Phenol at preservative concentrations does not mask endotoxin activity in the limulus amebocyte lysate assay, so the test can be run on the finished product without chemical interference. In multi-dose formulations, the closure system is selected by conducting accelerated stability studies at 40°C and 75% RH according to ICH Q1A(R2); free phenol is assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection at 270 nm because partition into closures and oil phases makes nominal concentration insufficient for shelf-life control.
The local anesthetic effect of phenol in topical formulations is produced by reversible protein denaturation of sensory nerve endings, a mechanism distinct from amide- and ester-type anesthetics. USP Grade Phenol is incorporated at 0.5–1.5% w/v in lotions, sprays, and emulsions for temporary relief of pain and itching. The unionized fraction controls stratum corneum permeation; above the pKa of 9.95, ionization dominates and skin penetration falls sharply, so compounded vehicles are buffered to pH 4.0–5.5. In an oil-in-water emulsion, phenol distributes among the oil phase, aqueous phase, and surfactant interface; the free aqueous concentration is lower than the nominal formula concentration because phenol partitions into the internal oil phase according to the emulsion oil-to-water ratio. This makes it necessary to run antimicrobial effectiveness testing on the final emulsion under USP <51>, and to assay the aqueous ultracentrifugate by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection at 270 nm rather than relying on a bulk assay. Phenol is incompatible with strong alkalis, potassium permanganate, hydrogen peroxide, and halogens; contact with strong oxidizing agents generates quinones, and a pink-to-red color change indicates oxidative degradation. Compounded preparations should be packaged in glass or high-density polyethylene containers; phenol permeates some polyolefins, so low-density polyethylene containers are not recommended. The terminal formulation may be a phenol-containing calamine lotion, an otic solution with sodium borate, or a topical spray. On mucous membranes, the concentration should not exceed 0.5% w/v; higher concentrations cause tissue sloughing and pain. Large-area application under occlusion is not recommended because phenol can be absorbed systemically and may cause cardiac arrhythmia after saturation of hepatic glucuronidation and sulfation. Nonsterile compounding is conducted under USP <795>; beyond-use dating is short unless a stability study confirms chemical and microbiological integrity.
When USP grade phenol is used as a starting material for salicylic acid, the process begins with formation of sodium phenoxide by combining molten phenol with 50% w/w sodium hydroxide solution in a jacketed stainless steel reactor. Water is removed under reduced pressure at 80–100°C to a moisture content below 0.5% w/w; residual water shortens the carboxylation step and promotes hydrolysis of downstream sodium salicylate. The dried sodium phenoxide is transferred to a gas-sparged autoclave and contacted with carbon dioxide at 120–140°C and CO2 partial pressures of 5–10 bar. The reaction is continued until carbon dioxide uptake ceases; conversion is monitored by titration of the sodium salicylate intermediate, and the end point is mass-transfer limited. The reactor is equipped with a turbine impeller operating at 200–400 rpm; lower agitation rates create localized para-hydroxybenzoic acid formation due to poor CO2 dispersion. The crude sodium salicylate is dissolved in hot water and acidified with sulfuric acid to precipitate salicylic acid at pH 2.0–2.5, followed by filtration and recrystallization from hot water. USP grade phenol reduces the load of chlorinated impurities and sulfonated by-products that appear when technical-grade phenol is used; residual phenol in the final salicylic acid must be controlled because it can carry forward into acetylsalicylic acid and produce phenol-related impurities during storage. The terminal salicylic acid is then acetylated with acetic anhydride at 75–85°C in a glass-lined reactor, with excess acetic anhydride quenched by controlled addition of water. The critical process limit is the temperature window in the carboxylation step: above 145°C, decomposition of sodium phenoxide increases sharply and the yield of salicylic acid drops, while below 110°C, the reaction rate becomes commercially unacceptable. Published yield data for USP-grade feed in this exact configuration is limited; the main operational control is the absence of water rather than the phenolic assay.
Table 2. Carboxylation process parameter windows for phenol-to-salicylate conversion.
| Parameter | Operational range | Equipment configuration | Failure mode |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium phenoxide moisture | <0.5% w/w | Jacketed reactor, 80–100°C, -0.08 MPa vacuum | Wet paste reduces CO2 uptake and increases hydrolysis yield loss |
| Carboxylation temperature | 120–140°C | Gas-sparged autoclave | Above 145°C decomposition; below 110°C low conversion |
| CO2 partial pressure | 5–10 bar | Sparge ring with mass flow controller | Low pressure reduces conversion; excessive pressure favors para-isomer |
| Agitation | 200–400 rpm | Turbine impeller | Poor gas dispersion raises 4-hydroxybenzoic acid formation |
| Acidification pH | 2.0–2.5 | pH controller | Incomplete precipitation above 2.5; side reactions below 2.0 |
Purification of salicylic acid derived from USP phenol includes recrystallization from hot deionized water with activated carbon; the recrystallized material is dried at 60–70°C to a moisture content below 0.5% w/w. Residual phenol is monitored by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection; a limit of not more than 0.01% w/w is commonly applied to salicylic acid intended for acetylsalicylic acid synthesis. The purified salicylic acid is tested against the relevant USP monograph for assay, residue on ignition, and color. The use of distilled phenol rather than technical-grade phenol does not alter the carboxylation mechanism, but it reduces the burden of cresol-derived isomers in the final salicylic acid and simplifies the recrystallization step.
Neurolytic applications of phenol rely on a concentration-dependent destruction of nerve fibers; concentrations below 1% w/v produce reversible anesthesia, while concentrations at or above 5% w/v denature axon proteins and cause Wallerian degeneration. In pain medicine, phenol is formulated at 5–10% w/v in glycerin or sterile water for injection, and the resulting solution is injected in volumes of 0.5–2.0 mL per site under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. Glycerin-based solutions are hyperbaric relative to cerebrospinal fluid, which allows gravity-dependent spread when the patient is positioned; this property is used in intrathecal neurolysis for cancer pain but creates a risk of unintended nerve-root injury if the patient is moved too soon after injection. The preparation must be compounded under USP <797> as a sterile preparation because phenol is not a preservative at neurolytic concentrations. Aqueous phenol diffuses more rapidly and is used for peripheral nerve blocks, while glycerin phenol spreads less and remains localized. Published clinical protocols for lumbar sympathetic neurolysis use 6–7% w/w aqueous phenol; intrathecal saddle block procedures use 5% w/w phenol in glycerin. The operational boundary is strict: intrathecal injection of phenol above 10% w/w has been associated with severe meningeal irritation, bladder dysfunction, and irreversible motor loss. The terminal product is a single-use neurolytic injection; it is not terminally sterilized by steam after compounding because phenol can decompose and discolor, so aseptic filtration through a 0.22 µm membrane is used where the vehicle permits. The resulting preparation must be protected from light and used within 24 h because oxidation to quinones increases neurotoxicity unpredictably. Endotoxin testing under USP <85> is required for intrathecal batches.
Deep chemical peeling solutions containing phenol are prepared as a two-phase hydroethanolic system, not as a simple aqueous dilution; the Baker-Gordon formulation uses 88% w/w liquefied phenol USP combined with croton oil and a hexachlorophene-based soap. The mixture separates on standing and must be swirled immediately before application to prevent localized high-concentration phenol streaks. Phenol causes immediate coagulation of epidermal proteins, which limits its own penetration; croton oil is added to disrupt the coagulum and permit a deeper peel. During a full-face phenol peel, the total applied phenol dose can exceed 3 g, and systemic absorption is rapid enough to require continuous cardiac monitoring, intravenous hydration, and pulse oximetry for the entire procedure. The liver metabolizes phenol by conjugation to glucuronide and sulfate; saturation of this pathway can lead to ventricular arrhythmia, so the procedure is contraindicated in patients with hepatic or renal impairment. The applied volume is typically limited to 1.0–1.5 mL per aesthetic unit, and the full face is treated in 30–60 min to avoid a bolus effect. The terminal result is controlled exfoliation of the papillary dermis and regeneration of collagen; the patient must be monitored for 45–60 min after the procedure. USP grade phenol is used because industrial-grade phenol contains cresols and sulfur impurities that worsen post-peel hyperpigmentation. The solution is compounded immediately before use under medical supervision; activated charcoal and antiarrhythmic drugs must be available in the procedure room. This use is not a conventional pharmaceutical dosage form and is governed by institutional protocols rather than USP <795>.
Acidic phenol extraction for RNA isolation requires equilibration of the organic phase with citrate or acetate buffer at pH 4.3–4.7; under these conditions RNA remains in the aqueous phase while DNA and proteins partition into the phenol-chloroform interphase or organic layer. For DNA extraction, the phenol is equilibrated with Tris-EDTA at pH 7.8–8.0, which retains DNA in the aqueous phase while proteins are denatured. USP Grade Phenol can serve as the starting material after distillation and saturation with the appropriate buffer, but the as-received USP monograph does not test for DNase or RNase activity. The organic phase is typically mixed with chloroform and isoamyl alcohol at a 25:24:1 ratio for DNA or a 50:48:2 ratio for RNA, and phase separation is achieved by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. RNA is precipitated from the aqueous phase with isopropanol in the presence of sodium acetate; DNA is precipitated with ethanol. The terminal products are purified total RNA or genomic DNA for reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction, microarray hybridization, and next-generation sequencing. The operational boundary is that oxidized phenol containing quinones degrades nucleic acids and reduces yield; phenol that has turned pink must be redistilled under nitrogen before use. Published data for substitution of USP grade phenol in nucleic acid extraction is limited, so each lot should be validated by measuring RNA integrity number on a bioanalyzer and spectrophotometric A260/A280 ratios between 1.8 and 2.0 for RNA, and between 1.7 and 1.9 for DNA. Extraction must be performed in a chemical fume hood because phenol is corrosive and volatile. This application is not a pharmaceutical manufacturing process and is outside the scope of USP <795>; it is governed by internal laboratory standard operating procedures.
Phenyl salicylate, known as salol, is synthesized from USP grade phenol and salicylic acid at a molar ratio of 1.5–2.0:1 phenol to salicylic acid, using a catalytic amount of phosphorus oxychloride or concentrated sulfuric acid. The reaction is run under reflux at 150–160°C in a glass-lined reactor with a Dean-Stark trap for water removal; excess phenol is used to shift equilibrium and is later recovered by distillation. The molten product is washed with dilute sodium carbonate solution to remove unreacted salicylic acid, then recrystallized from ethanol to a melting point of 41–43°C. Phenyl salicylate is used as an ultraviolet absorber in topical formulations and as a chemical intermediate for analgesics and antipyretics. The critical quality attribute is absence of free phenol; the recrystallized product is assayed for free phenol by gas chromatography with a limit of not more than 0.1% w/w. The reaction mass must be kept anhydrous because water hydrolyzes phenyl salicylate back to phenol and salicylic acid, reducing yield. The use of USP grade phenol minimizes cresol and chlorophenol impurities that would otherwise form phenyl cresol esters with different melting points and dermatological irritation profiles. The terminal product is a white crystalline solid that is slightly soluble in water and freely soluble in ethanol; it is packaged in amber glass to prevent photochemical yellowing. Melting range is confirmed according to USP <741>.
Competitive USP Grade Phenol prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@boxa-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615651039172
Email: sales9@boxa-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
USP Grade Phenol (CAS 108-95-2; IUPAC benzene-1-ol; molecular formula C6H6O; relative molecular mass 94.11) is a compendial aromatic alcohol supplied as solid crystals, free-flowing crystal mass, or temperature-controlled molten liquid. The current United States Pharmacopeia monograph defines the material by assay bounds of 99.0% to 100.5% C6H6O, with additional limits for water, nonvolatile residue, clarity and reaction. The designation “USP Grade” therefore refers to compliance with an absolute compendial monograph and is not equivalent to a commercial assay claim. Physical-form descriptors such as Phenol USP, Phenol Dense Crystals USP, and Phenol Molten USP reflect packaging, crystallisation, and transfer configuration rather than a different purity tier.
In molten transfer operations, the solidification point near 40.8 °C controls equipment design. Dedicated storage systems are typically fabricated from 316L stainless steel with hot-water jackets maintained at 45–55 °C and steam-traced low-point drains; stagnant regions are avoided because solidified phenol blocks piping and expands upon remelting. Nitrogen blanketing is applied to reduce oxidative formation of colored quinoid species and to limit water absorption during tank breathing. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles are undesirable because surface condensation generates localized water uptake and crystal bridging in headspace regions, which can shift assay and water results in subsequent batch samples.
Oxidative discoloration in phenol is accelerated by trace transition-metal ions and by headspace oxygen. In production-scale storage systems with nitrogen inerting, color onset is delayed; however, no universal oxygen threshold applies because impurity metal content varies by route and equipment passivation. Transfer lines are cleaned and passivated after installation, and metal profiling by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry is used to set site-specific storage intervals. Water content is monitored at tank heel and after recirculation because phenolic melt can absorb atmospheric moisture in humid locations; sites in climates above 60% relative humidity typically rely on closed-transfer nitrogen systems rather than open manway charging.
Technical phenol from cumene hydroperoxide or coal-tar refining may show a gas chromatographic assay above 99.0%, but the USP monograph adds compound-specific controls that are not implied by a single assay figure. The pharmacopeial release includes identity tests such as infrared absorption and ferric chloride reaction, clarity of solution and reaction, water not more than 0.5% by USP <921> Method I, and nonvolatile residue not more than 0.05%. Technical-grade material used for bisphenol-A, caprolactam, or phenolic resin production is not routinely tested against these monographs and may contain cresols, xylenols, sulfur odorants, or colored oxidation products that would fail compendial appearance and purity criteria. A supplier certificate citing a 99.8% GC assay is therefore insufficient to establish USP Grade Phenol status without full monograph testing.
Incoming pharmaceutical component control under 21 CFR 211.84 requires at least one identity test and verification of supplier documentation. Typically, gas chromatography on a bonded polyethylene glycol capillary column with flame ionisation detection is used for assay and phenolic impurity profiling; water is determined by USP <921> Method I, and clarity is confirmed in a 1 g/15 mL aqueous dilution. Retention samples are held in sealed amber glass under nitrogen at 2–8 °C for the batch-record retention period. Sites that receive molten phenol commonly perform the clarity test after controlled solidification and remelting under nitrogen, because air contact during remelt can generate color bodies that do not represent the original bulk.
USP Grade Phenol is used as an active pharmaceutical ingredient in topical anesthetic, external analgesic, and oral anesthetic formulations where the compendial purity and water limit are material to formulation stability. Aqueous solubility is approximately 8.3 g/100 mL at 20 °C, which sets an upper boundary for simple aqueous compounding without co-solvents. In oil-in-water emulsions or micellar systems containing polysorbate 80, partitioning into the oil phase or surfactant micelles reduces the free aqueous phenol concentration; therefore antimicrobial preservative claims require verification by USP <51> antimicrobial effectiveness testing in the finished product. Published data for specific polysorbate-phenol partition coefficients in compendial compounded formulations is limited, so formulation-specific challenge testing remains the controlling method.
For external analgesic compounding, the product is normally dissolved or dispersed at controlled temperature below 50 °C in a closed glass-lined or 316L vessel to minimise vapour exposure. Concentrations used in finished topical preparations are controlled by the applicable NDA, ANDA, or USP compounding monograph rather than by a universal concentration limit. Batch records should record the temperature history of the molten charge, because excessive heat can increase the vapor-phase concentration and change the headspace composition of the processing room.
A saturated aqueous solution at 20 °C contains approximately 8.3 g/100 mL phenol and is weakly acidic. Dilution of molten phenol into water should be performed by adding phenol to water with agitation and cooling; reverse addition of water to molten phenol can cause localized exotherm and vapor release. The heat of solution is moderate, but temperature control below 50 °C is standard to minimise headspace concentration.
Phenol, Liquefied USP is a separate monograph prepared by adding approximately 10% water to melted phenol, with an assay not less than 89.0% C6H6O. It is not a direct substitute for USP Grade Phenol in water-sensitive reactions, anhydrous topical vehicles, or processes where the 0.5% water ceiling is part of the batch release specification. The added water alters mass balance in acid chloride, isocyanate, or Grignard-related syntheses and can promote hydrolysis of moisture-sensitive ester or anhydride intermediates. Where liquefied phenol is prescribed for external use, the water fraction must be incorporated into the formulation calculation rather than treated as inert diluent.
USP Grade Phenol is a weak acid with pKa near 9.99 at 25 °C and is reactive toward strong oxidizers, concentrated nitric acid, and aqueous hypochlorite; neutralisation with alkaline solutions is exothermic and can produce phenolic salts with altered solubility. It is incompatible with uncontrolled oxidizing storage conditions and with reactive metals that catalyse red-brown quinone formation. In pharmaceutical compounding, contact with natural rubber or some seal materials can extract plasticizers into the product; ethylene-propylene diene monomer or fluoropolymer-lined closures are preferred where contact is continuous. Process equipment should be cleaned with dedicated procedures because phenolic residues can taint subsequent products at trace concentrations below visual detection.
| Test | Acceptance criterion | Method/standard |
|---|---|---|
| Assay (C6H6O) | 99.0%–100.5% | USP Phenol monograph, gas chromatography |
| Water | ≤0.5% | USP <921> Method I |
| Nonvolatile residue | ≤0.05% | USP Phenol monograph, residue method |
| Clarity of solution and reaction | Clear; neutral or acid to litmus | USP Phenol monograph, 1 g/15 mL dilution |
| Identification | Positive IR and ferric chloride reaction | USP <197K>; USP Phenol monograph |
Analytical release for raw material is distinct from finished-product stability-indicating methods. A gas chromatographic method on a polyethylene glycol phase resolves phenol from cresols and xylenols, while liquid chromatography with a phenyl column and UV detection near 270 nm is suitable for aqueous dosage-form matrices. The USP monograph assay is not automatically stability-indicating for finished products; forced degradation under acid, base, oxidative, thermal, and photolytic stress is used during method validation to establish peak purity and mass balance. Published data for specific phenol-containing finished products is limited, so site-specific validation is expected.
Occupational handling requires local exhaust ventilation and skin protection because phenol is absorbed through intact skin and is corrosive. GHS classification includes acute oral, dermal, and inhalation toxicity, severe skin burns, and suspected genetic defect categories; the OSHA permissible exposure limit is 5 ppm as an 8-hour TWA with skin notation. Emergency shower and eye wash stations should be placed in molten unloading areas; solid phenol in cold rooms should be handled to minimise dust generation, with respiratory protection evaluated against the solid particulate and vapour exposure profile.
Packaging configurations for USP Grade Phenol vary with melt point and downstream process scale. Solid crystalline forms are commonly packed in 200 kg steel drums with polyethylene liners; molten forms are shipped in heated tank containers or dedicated 316L tanker trailers with temperature loggers and recirculation loops. Laboratory-scale packaging in amber glass bottles under nitrogen is available for formulation development. The selection of packaging should be recorded in the batch record because phenolic discoloration and water uptake are influenced by headspace oxygen and closure material.
The distinctions among commonly available phenol grades are summarised in the following matrix. These are summary profiles, not specifications; compendial limits control only USP-grade materials.
| Grade | Key measurable profile | Typical industrial role |
|---|---|---|
| USP Grade Phenol | Assay 99.0–100.5%; water ≤0.5%; nonvolatile residue ≤0.05% | Pharmaceutical APIs, topical compounding, moisture-sensitive synthesis |
| Phenol, Liquefied USP | Assay ≥89.0%; water approximately 10% | External/wet formulations where added water is part of the formula |
| Technical-grade phenol | Assay often ≥99.0% but not bound by USP water/residue/appearance criteria | Bisphenol-A, caprolactam, phenolic resins |
| ACS reagent grade | Assay and residue limits set by ACS specifications; not compendial for drug use | Laboratory synthesis and analytical standardisation |
ACS reagent-grade phenol is controlled by American Chemical Society specifications rather than a pharmacopeial monograph. While an ACS lot may pass many of the same compendial tests, the certificate does not provide the same regulatory standing for pharmaceutical manufacturing under FDA or EU GMP because the monograph reference, batch record chain, and compendial change notification may differ. A manufacturer cannot automatically substitute ACS-grade material into a USP drug product without qualifying the source against the USP monograph and updating supplier qualification documents.
No. The USP monograph for Phenol does not include bacterial endotoxins, sterility, or particulate matter tests under general chapters USP <85>, USP <71>, or USP <788>. A compendial phenol may be used in sterile product manufacturing only after formulation, sterilization by filtration or heat, and validated aseptic processing; the raw material itself is not certified sterile. If used as a preservative in multi-dose parenterals, the finished product must meet antimicrobial effectiveness testing USP <51> and the relevant regulatory requirements for preservative content. Purchase specifications for such applications typically add endotoxin and bioburden acceptance criteria that are absent from the basic USP monograph.
Cumene hydroperoxide cleavage is the dominant synthetic route for phenol, including USP grade. The cumene route can leave residual cumene, alpha-methylstyrene, and phenolic condensation products; USP-grade purification removes these to the degree required to meet the monograph. Coal-tar phenol can have sulfur-containing impurities that are detectable by odor and can fail the clarity/reaction test. Batch records for USP Grade Phenol therefore should identify the synthetic route and purification step, because route changes may alter residual impurity profiles even when assay and water remain within limits.
Residual volatile impurities from the cumene process may include benzene, cumene, or alpha-methylstyrene depending on the route. The USP monograph does not universally specify an ICH Q3C residual solvent test for these species; instead, supplier qualification often includes a gas chromatographic headspace profile and a documented risk assessment for the intended dosage form. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, so compendial release alone should not be interpreted as a complete residual solvent clearance.